↓ Skip to main content

反動力によって立位を維持する倒立振子の研究

Overview of attention for article published in Biomechanisms, January 1973
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
反動力によって立位を維持する倒立振子の研究
Published in
Biomechanisms, January 1973
DOI 10.3951/biomechanisms.2.321
Authors

江村 超, 酒井 高男

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 50%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 2 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,762,708
of 25,205,864 outputs
Outputs from Biomechanisms
#6
of 39 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,448
of 18,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomechanisms
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,205,864 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 39 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one scored the same or higher as 33 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 18,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them