↓ Skip to main content

Control of Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Neurological Emergencies

Overview of attention for article published in Current Hypertension Reports, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Control of Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Neurological Emergencies
Published in
Current Hypertension Reports, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11906-014-0436-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa Manning, Thompson G. Robinson, Craig S. Anderson

Abstract

Neurological hypertensive emergencies cause significant morbidity and mortality. Most occur in the setting of ischaemic stroke, spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), or subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), but other causes relate to hypertensive encephalopathy and reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS). Prompt and controlled reduction of blood pressure (BP) is necessary, although there remains uncertainty as to the optimal rate of decline and ideal antihypertensive agent. There is probably no single treatment strategy that covers all neurological hypertensive emergencies. Prompt diagnosis of the underlying disorder, recognition of its severity, and appropriate targeted treatment are required. Lack of comparative-effectiveness data leaves clinicians with limited evidence-based guidance in management, although significant developments have occurred recently in the field. In this article, we review the management of specific neurological hypertensive emergencies, with particular emphasis on recent evidence.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 67 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 18%
Researcher 10 15%
Other 10 15%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 10 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 57%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 13 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2015.
All research outputs
#2,359,754
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Current Hypertension Reports
#77
of 732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,176
of 226,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Hypertension Reports
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 732 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.