| Title |
Effectiveness of the 5-As Tobacco Cessation Treatments in Nine HMOs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, December 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-008-0865-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Virginia P. Quinn, Jack F. Hollis, K. Sabina Smith, Nancy A. Rigotti, Leif I. Solberg, Weiming Hu, Victor J. Stevens |
| Abstract |
Smoking remains the leading cause of preventable mortality in the US. The national clinical guideline recommends an intervention for tobacco use known as the 5-As (Ask, Advise, Assess, Assist, and Arrange). Little is known about the model's effectiveness outside the research setting. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Italy | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 78 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 19% |
| Unknown | 20 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 36% |
| Psychology | 7 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 23 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,305,641
of 25,385,864 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1,706
of 8,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,712
of 179,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#7
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.