You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
五島列島におけるカワウソの分布と絶滅
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Honyurui Kagaku (Mammalian Science), February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.11238/mammalianscience.56.151 |
| Authors |
上田 浩一, 安田 雅俊 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 5 | 22% |
| Unknown | 18 | 78% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,826,146
of 25,587,485 outputs
Outputs from Honyurui Kagaku (Mammalian Science)
#13
of 330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,500
of 426,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Honyurui Kagaku (Mammalian Science)
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,587,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 330 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.