Title |
HIV vaccine acceptability among high-risk drug users in Appalachia: a cross-sectional study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, May 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-537 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
April M Young, Ralph J DiClemente, Daniel S Halgin, Claire E Sterk, Jennifer R Havens |
Abstract |
A vaccine could substantially impact the HIV epidemic, but inadequate uptake is a serious concern. Unfortunately, people who use drugs, particularly those residing in rural communities, have been underrepresented in previous research on HIV vaccine acceptability. This study examined HIV vaccine acceptability among high-risk drug users in a rural community in the United States. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 67% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 3% |
Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 76 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 17 | 22% |
Student > Master | 13 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
Librarian | 4 | 5% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
Other | 12 | 15% |
Unknown | 23 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 14 | 18% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 18% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 11% |
Psychology | 5 | 6% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Unknown | 28 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2014.
All research outputs
#14,134,044
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#10,242
of 14,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,596
of 226,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#204
of 289 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,831 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,629 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 289 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.