↓ Skip to main content

Fluid Biosemiotic Mechanisms Underlie Subconscious Habits

Overview of attention for article published in Biosemiotics, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Fluid Biosemiotic Mechanisms Underlie Subconscious Habits
Published in
Biosemiotics, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12304-017-9298-3
Authors

V. N. Alexander, Valerie Grimes

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Other 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 25%
Psychology 1 25%
Decision Sciences 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2017.
All research outputs
#15,475,586
of 22,997,544 outputs
Outputs from Biosemiotics
#138
of 211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,141
of 315,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biosemiotics
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,997,544 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 211 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.