↓ Skip to main content

Biofilms in chronic rhinosinusitis: Pathophysiology and therapeutic strategies

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 157)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
4 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biofilms in chronic rhinosinusitis: Pathophysiology and therapeutic strategies
Published in
World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, December 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.wjorl.2016.03.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Judd H. Fastenberg, Wayne D. Hsueh, Ali Mustafa, Nadeem A. Akbar, Waleed M. Abuzeid

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that biofilms are critical to the pathophysiology of chronic infections including chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Until relatively recently, our understanding of biofilms was limited. Recent advances in methods for biofilm identification and molecular biology have offered new insights into the role of biofilms in CRS. With these insights, investigators have begun to investigate novel therapeutic strategies that may disrupt or eradicate biofilms in CRS. This review seeks to explore the evidence implicating biofilms in CRS, discuss potential anti-biofilm therapeutic strategies, and suggest future directions for research. The existing evidence strongly supports the role of biofilms in the pathogenesis of CRS. Several anti-biofilm therapies have been investigated for use in CRS and these are at variable stages of development. Generally, these strategies: 1) neutralize biofilm microbes; 2) disperse existing biofilms; or 3) disrupt quorum sensing. Several of the most promising anti-biofilm therapeutic strategies are reviewed. A better understanding of biofilm function and their contribution to the CRS disease process will be pivotal to the development of novel treatments that may augment and, potentially, redefine the CRS treatment paradigm. There is tremendous potential for future research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 119 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Researcher 10 8%
Student > Master 10 8%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 44 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 5%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 46 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2022.
All research outputs
#3,564,883
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
#16
of 157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,449
of 416,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them