↓ Skip to main content

The role of cosmetics in attributions about sexual harassment

Overview of attention for article published in Sex Roles, June 1991
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
The role of cosmetics in attributions about sexual harassment
Published in
Sex Roles, June 1991
DOI 10.1007/bf00288211
Authors

Jane E. Workman, Kim K. P. Johnson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 1 7%
Unknown 13 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 29%
Student > Postgraduate 2 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 14%
Other 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 3 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 5 36%
Social Sciences 4 29%
Design 1 7%
Unknown 4 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2018.
All research outputs
#14,710,833
of 25,269,846 outputs
Outputs from Sex Roles
#1,468
of 2,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,458
of 16,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sex Roles
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,269,846 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.4. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 16,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.