↓ Skip to main content

Oblique Orientation Discrimination Thresholds Are Superior in Those with a High Level of Autistic Traits

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
Oblique Orientation Discrimination Thresholds Are Superior in Those with a High Level of Autistic Traits
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10803-014-2147-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abigail Dickinson, Myles Jones, Elizabeth Milne

Abstract

Enhanced low-level perception, although present in individuals with autism, is not seen in individuals with high, but non-clinical, levels of autistic traits (Brock et al.in Percept Lond 40(6):739. doi: 10.1068/p6953 , 2011). This is surprising, as many of the higher-level visual differences found in autism have been shown to correlate with autistic traits in non-clinical samples. Here we measure vertical-oblique and, more difficult, oblique-oblique orientation discrimination thresholds in a non-clinical sample. As predicted, oblique-oblique thresholds provided a more sensitive test of orientation discrimination, and were negatively related to autistic traits (N = 94, r = -.356, p < .0001). We conclude that individual differences in orientation discrimination and autistic traits are related, and suggest that both of these factors could be mediated by increased levels of the inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 18%
Student > Master 11 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 15 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 35%
Neuroscience 9 14%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 17 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2015.
All research outputs
#6,678,005
of 25,199,243 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#2,378
of 5,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,662
of 232,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#25
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,199,243 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.