↓ Skip to main content

Reply to “Ichthyosaur embryos outside the mother body: not due to carcass explosion but to carcass implosion” by van Loon (2013)

Overview of attention for article published in Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Reply to “Ichthyosaur embryos outside the mother body: not due to carcass explosion but to carcass implosion” by van Loon (2013)
Published in
Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/s12549-014-0162-z
Authors

Achim G. Reisdorf, Gail S. Anderson, Lynne S. Bell, Christian Klug, Annette Schmid-Röhl, Hans-Joachim Röhl, Michael Jung, Michael Wuttke, Michael W. Maisch, Mark Benecke, Daniel Wyler, Roman Bux, Peter Fornaro, Andreas Wetzel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 3%
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 27 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 10 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2022.
All research outputs
#4,814,130
of 23,476,369 outputs
Outputs from Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments
#64
of 334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,811
of 228,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,476,369 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them