↓ Skip to main content

Even a stopped clock tells the right time twice a day: circadian timekeeping in Drosophila

Overview of attention for article published in Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
Even a stopped clock tells the right time twice a day: circadian timekeeping in Drosophila
Published in
Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, January 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00424-006-0188-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ben Collins, Justin Blau

Abstract

"Even a stopped clock tells the right time twice a day, and for once I'm inclined to believe Withnail is right. We are indeed drifting into the arena of the unwell... What we need is harmony. Fresh air. Stuff like that" "Bruce Robinson (1986, ref. 1)". Although a stopped Drosophila clock probably does not tell the right time even once a day, recent findings have demonstrated that accurate circadian time-keeping is dependent on harmony between groups of clock neurons within the brain. Furthermore, when harmony between the environment and the endogenous clock is lost, as during jet lag, we definitely feel unwell. In this review, we provide an overview of the current understanding of circadian rhythms in Drosophila, focussing on recent discoveries that demonstrate how approximately 100 neurons within the Drosophila brain control the behaviour of the whole fly, and how these rhythms respond to the environment.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 5%
Portugal 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 60 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 26%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 6 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 48%
Neuroscience 10 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 8 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2013.
All research outputs
#21,162,249
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology
#1,798
of 1,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,324
of 163,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology
#13
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,973 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.