| Title |
The Effects of Positive and Negative Parenting Practices on Adolescent Mental Health Outcomes in a Multicultural Sample of Rural Youth
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Child Psychiatry & Human Development, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10578-014-0474-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul R. Smokowski, Martica L. Bacallao, Katie L. Cotter, Caroline B. R. Evans |
| Abstract |
The quality of parent-child relationships has a significant impact on adolescent developmental outcomes, especially mental health. Given the lack of research on rural adolescent mental health in general and rural parent-child relationships in particular, the current longitudinal study explores how rural adolescents' (N = 2,617) perceptions of parenting practices effect their mental health (i.e., anxiety, depression, aggression, self-esteem, future optimism, and school satisfaction) over a 1 year period. Regression models showed that current parenting practices (i.e., in Year 2) were strongly associated with current adolescent mental health outcomes. Negative current parenting, manifesting in parent-adolescent conflict, was related to higher adolescent anxiety, depression, and aggression and lower self-esteem, and school satisfaction. Past parent-adolescent conflict (i.e., in Year 1) also positively predicted adolescent aggression in the present. Current positive parenting (i.e., parent support, parent-child future orientation, and parent education support) was significantly associated with less depression and higher self-esteem, future optimism, and school satisfaction. Past parent education support was also related to current adolescent future optimism. Implications for practice and limitations were discussed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Qatar | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 287 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 284 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 50 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 7% |
| Researcher | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 40 | 14% |
| Unknown | 96 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 98 | 34% |
| Social Sciences | 33 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 5% |
| Unknown | 106 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2022.
All research outputs
#2,487,818
of 23,408,972 outputs
Outputs from Child Psychiatry & Human Development
#80
of 937 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,844
of 228,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child Psychiatry & Human Development
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,408,972 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 937 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.