↓ Skip to main content

Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 103,734)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
2376 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2628 Mendeley
citeulike
15 CiteULike
Title
Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2014
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1320040111
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam D. I. Kramer, Jamie E. Guillory, Jeffrey T. Hancock

Abstract

Emotional states can be transferred to others via emotional contagion, leading people to experience the same emotions without their awareness. Emotional contagion is well established in laboratory experiments, with people transferring positive and negative emotions to others. Data from a large real-world social network, collected over a 20-y period suggests that longer-lasting moods (e.g., depression, happiness) can be transferred through networks [Fowler JH, Christakis NA (2008) BMJ 337:a2338], although the results are controversial. In an experiment with people who use Facebook, we test whether emotional contagion occurs outside of in-person interaction between individuals by reducing the amount of emotional content in the News Feed. When positive expressions were reduced, people produced fewer positive posts and more negative posts; when negative expressions were reduced, the opposite pattern occurred. These results indicate that emotions expressed by others on Facebook influence our own emotions, constituting experimental evidence for massive-scale contagion via social networks. This work also suggests that, in contrast to prevailing assumptions, in-person interaction and nonverbal cues are not strictly necessary for emotional contagion, and that the observation of others' positive experiences constitutes a positive experience for people.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4,014 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,628 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 46 2%
United Kingdom 21 <1%
Spain 11 <1%
Brazil 11 <1%
Germany 10 <1%
Japan 9 <1%
Portugal 5 <1%
Netherlands 5 <1%
Australia 5 <1%
Other 44 2%
Unknown 2461 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 505 19%
Student > Master 360 14%
Student > Bachelor 344 13%
Researcher 271 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 128 5%
Other 476 18%
Unknown 544 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 437 17%
Social Sciences 429 16%
Computer Science 301 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 157 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 100 4%
Other 564 21%
Unknown 640 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7892. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2024.
All research outputs
#322
of 25,782,917 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#9
of 103,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1
of 242,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#1
of 950 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,734 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 950 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.