↓ Skip to main content

Comorbidity, Hospitalization, and Mortality in COPD: Results from a Longitudinal Study

Overview of attention for article published in Lung, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
145 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
Title
Comorbidity, Hospitalization, and Mortality in COPD: Results from a Longitudinal Study
Published in
Lung, January 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00408-009-9222-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudio Terzano, Vittoria Conti, Fabio Di Stefano, Angelo Petroianni, Daniela Ceccarelli, Elda Graziani, Salvatore Mariotta, Alberto Ricci, Antonio Vitarelli, Giovanni Puglisi, Corrado De Vito, Paolo Villari, Luigi Allegra

Abstract

We evaluated comorbidity, hospitalization, and mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), with special attention to risk factors for frequent hospitalizations (more than three during the follow-up period), and prognostic factors for death. Two hundred eighty-eight consecutive COPD patients admitted to respiratory medicine wards in four hospitals for acute exacerbation were enrolled from 1999 to 2000 in a prospective longitudinal study, and followed up until December 2007. The Charlson index without age was used to quantify comorbidity. Clinical and biochemical parameters and pulmonary function data were evaluated as potential predictive factors of mortality and hospitalization. FEV(1), RV, PaO(2), and PaCO(2) were used to develop an index of respiratory functional impairment (REFI index). Hypertension was the most common comorbidity (64.2%), followed by chronic renal failure (26.3%), diabetes mellitus (25.3%), and cardiac diseases (22.1%). Main causes of hospitalization were exacerbation of COPD (41.2%) and cardiovascular disease (34.4%). Most of the 56 deaths (19.4%) were due to cardiovascular disease (67.8%). Mortality risk depended on age, current smoking, FEV(1), PaO(2), the REFI index, the presence of cor pulmonale, ischemic heart disease, and lung cancer. Number and length of hospital admissions depended on the degree of dyspnea and REFI index. The correct management of respiratory disease and the implementation of aggressive strategies to prevent or treat comorbidities are necessary for better care of COPD patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 143 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 12%
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Postgraduate 16 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Other 38 26%
Unknown 30 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Unspecified 4 3%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 44 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2014.
All research outputs
#18,372,841
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Lung
#657
of 884 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,962
of 164,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lung
#9
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 884 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.