↓ Skip to main content

Using Wordless Picture Books to Support Emergent Literacy

Overview of attention for article published in Early Childhood Education Journal, March 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
Title
Using Wordless Picture Books to Support Emergent Literacy
Published in
Early Childhood Education Journal, March 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1014584509011
Authors

Mary Renck Jalongo, Denise Dragich, Natalie K. Conrad, Ann Zhang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 120 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 11%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 30 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 42 34%
Arts and Humanities 19 16%
Psychology 11 9%
Linguistics 5 4%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 32 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2014.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Early Childhood Education Journal
#777
of 823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,690
of 49,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Early Childhood Education Journal
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 823 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.