↓ Skip to main content

A review of the anticancer and immunomodulatory effects of Lycium barbarum fruit

Overview of attention for article published in Inflammopharmacology, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
A review of the anticancer and immunomodulatory effects of Lycium barbarum fruit
Published in
Inflammopharmacology, December 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10787-011-0107-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wai-Man Tang, Enoch Chan, Ching-Yee Kwok, Yee-Ki Lee, Jian-Hong Wu, Chun-Wai Wan, Robbie Yat-Kan Chan, Peter Hoi-Fu Yu, Shun-Wan Chan

Abstract

The anticancer effects of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) have attracted the attention of the public vis-à-vis existing cancer therapies with various side effects. Lycium barbarum fruit, commonly known as Gou Qi Zi in China, is a potential anticancer agent/adjuvant. Its major active ingredients, L. barbarum polysaccharides (LBP), scopoletin and 2-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-L-ascorbic acid (AA-2βG), are found to have apoptotic and antiproliferative effects on cancer cell lines. Moreover, LBP also contributes to body's immunomodulatory effects and enhances effects of other cancer therapies. It is not known whether there are any undesirable effects. Further studies on its pharmacological mechanisms and toxicology could facilitate a safe usage of this TCM herb.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 3%
Japan 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Unknown 66 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 20%
Researcher 13 19%
Student > Bachelor 12 17%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 4%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 10%
Chemistry 6 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 13 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,695,840
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Inflammopharmacology
#58
of 530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,831
of 243,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inflammopharmacology
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.