↓ Skip to main content

Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) discriminate between knowing and not knowing and collect information as needed before acting

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, April 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs

Citations

dimensions_citation
191 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
Title
Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) discriminate between knowing and not knowing and collect information as needed before acting
Published in
Animal Cognition, April 2004
DOI 10.1007/s10071-004-0215-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert R. Hampton, Aaron Zivin, Elisabeth A. Murray

Abstract

Humans use memory awareness to determine whether relevant knowledge is available before acting, as when we determine whether we know a phone number before dialing. Such metacognition, or thinking about thinking, can improve selection of appropriate behavior. We investigated whether rhesus monkeys ( Macaca mulatta) are capable of a simple form of metacognitive access to the contents of short-term memory. Monkeys chose among four opaque tubes, one of which concealed food. The tube containing the reward varied randomly from trial to trial. On half the trials the monkeys observed the experimenter baiting the tube, whereas on the remaining trials their view of the baiting was blocked. On each trial, monkeys were allowed a single chance to select the tube containing the reward. During the choice period the monkeys had the opportunity to look down the length of each tube, to determine if it contained food. When they knew the location of the reward, most monkeys chose without looking. In contrast, when ignorant, monkeys often made the effort required to look, thereby learning the location of the reward before choosing. Looking improved accuracy on trials on which monkeys had not observed the baiting. The difference in looking behavior between trials on which the monkeys knew, and trials on which they were ignorant, suggests that rhesus monkeys discriminate between knowing and not knowing. This result extends similar observations made of children and apes to a species of Old World monkey, suggesting that the underlying cognitive capacities may be widely distributed among primates.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 5%
Brazil 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 135 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 23%
Student > Master 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 5%
Other 28 19%
Unknown 12 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 51 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 30%
Neuroscience 16 11%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 19 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2014.
All research outputs
#2,129,545
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#460
of 1,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,085
of 58,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,444 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.