Title |
Novel prostate cancer immunotherapy with a DNA-encoded anti-prostate-specific membrane antigen monoclonal antibody
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, August 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00262-017-2042-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kar Muthumani, Liron Marnin, Sagar B. Kudchodkar, Alfredo Perales-Puchalt, Hyeree Choi, Sangya Agarwal, Veronica L. Scott, Emma L. Reuschel, Faraz I. Zaidi, Elizabeth K. Duperret, Megan C. Wise, Kimberly A. Kraynyak, Kenneth. E. Ugen, Niranjan Y. Sardesai, J. Joseph Kim, David B. Weiner |
Abstract |
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is expressed at high levels on malignant prostate cells and is likely an important therapeutic target for the treatment of prostate carcinoma. Current immunotherapy approaches to target PSMA include peptide, cell, vector or DNA-based vaccines as well as passive administration of PSMA-specific monoclonal antibodies (mAb). Conventional mAb immunotherapy has numerous logistical and practical limitations, including high production costs and a requirement for frequent dosing due to short mAb serum half-life. In this report, we describe a novel strategy of antibody-based immunotherapy against prostate carcinoma that utilizes synthetic DNA plasmids that encode a therapeutic human mAb that target PSMA. Electroporation-enhanced intramuscular injection of the DNA-encoded mAb (DMAb) plasmid into mice led to the production of functional and durable levels of the anti-PSMA antibody. The anti-PSMA produced in vivo controlled tumor growth and prolonged survival in a mouse model. This is likely mediated by antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) effect with the aid of NK cells. Further study of this novel approach for treatment of human prostate disease and other malignant conditions is warranted. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 24% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 12% |
Spain | 2 | 12% |
Ireland | 1 | 6% |
Philippines | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 14 | 82% |
Scientists | 2 | 12% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 14 | 24% |
Other | 8 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 12% |
Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
Other | 8 | 14% |
Unknown | 8 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Immunology and Microbiology | 11 | 19% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 19% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 12% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 10% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Unknown | 15 | 26% |