You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of Movement Velocity during Resistance Training on Neuromuscular Performance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Sports Medicine, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1055/s-0033-1363985 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
F Pareja-Blanco, D Rodríguez-Rosell, L Sánchez-Medina, E M Gorostiaga, J J González-Badillo |
| Abstract |
This study aimed to compare the effect on neuromuscular performance of 2 isoinertial resistance training programs that differed only in actual repetition velocity: maximal intended (MaxV) vs. half-maximal (HalfV) concentric velocity. 21 resistance-trained young men were randomly assigned to a MaxV (n=10) or HalfV (n=11) group and trained for 6 weeks using the full squat exercise. A complementary study (n=8) described the acute metabolic and mechanical response to the protocols used. MaxV training resulted in a likely more beneficial effect than HalfV on squat performance: maximum strength (ES: 0.94 vs. 0.54), velocity developed against all (ES: 1.76 vs. 0.88), light (ES: 1.76 vs. 0.75) and heavy (ES: 2.03 vs. 1.64) loads common to pre- and post-tests, and CMJ height (ES: 0.63 vs. 0.15). The effect on 20-m sprint was unclear, however. Both groups attained the greatest improvements in squat performance at their training velocities. Movement velocity seemed to be of greater importance than time under tension for inducing strength adaptations. Slightly higher metabolic stress (blood lactate and ammonia) and CMJ height loss were found for MaxV vs. HalfV, while metabolite levels were low to moderate for both conditions. MaxV may provide a superior stimulus for inducing adaptations directed towards improving athletic performance. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 76 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 21 | 28% |
| United States | 8 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 5% |
| Canada | 3 | 4% |
| Australia | 3 | 4% |
| Mexico | 2 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 29 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 53 | 70% |
| Scientists | 17 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 543 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Qatar | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 535 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 96 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 73 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 61 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 32 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 30 | 6% |
| Other | 106 | 20% |
| Unknown | 145 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 286 | 53% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 1% |
| Other | 29 | 5% |
| Unknown | 163 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2023.
All research outputs
#640,064
of 24,166,358 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Sports Medicine
#57
of 2,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,161
of 231,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Sports Medicine
#5
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,166,358 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,350 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.