↓ Skip to main content

The safety of exercise training in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Neurological Sciences, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
207 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
301 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The safety of exercise training in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review
Published in
Journal of the Neurological Sciences, May 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.jns.2014.05.016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lara A. Pilutti, Matthew E. Platta, Robert W. Motl, Amy E. Latimer-Cheung

Abstract

There are many reviews documenting the benefits of exercise training among persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). To date, we are unaware of a review that summarizes the risks of relapse and other adverse events (AEs) associated with exercise training, yet this is critical for informing decisions and recommendations regarding the safety of this behavior. We conducted a systematic review of relapse and other AEs reported in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of exercise training in MS. We searched electronic databases for RCTs of exercise training in MS. We calculated the rate of relapse and AEs, and the relative risk of relapse and AEs for exercise training versus control. Twenty-six studies were reviewed that included 1295 participants. We determined that the rate of relapse was 6.3% and 4.6% for control and exercise, respectively. The rate of AEs was 1.2% and 2.0% for control and exercise, respectively. The relative risk of relapse for exercise training was 0.73, whereas the relative risk of AE for exercise training was 1.67. Exercise training was not associated with an increased risk of relapse, and risk of AEs was not higher than in healthy populations. This evidence should alleviate uncertainty regarding the safety of exercise training in MS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 301 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 296 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 50 17%
Student > Master 46 15%
Researcher 31 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 10%
Other 19 6%
Other 56 19%
Unknown 68 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 20%
Sports and Recreations 50 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 13%
Neuroscience 21 7%
Psychology 10 3%
Other 36 12%
Unknown 84 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,828,096
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Neurological Sciences
#163
of 5,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,937
of 241,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Neurological Sciences
#2
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,250 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.