↓ Skip to main content

Environmental and socio-demographic associates of children’s active transport to school: a cross-sectional investigation from the URBAN Study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
253 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Environmental and socio-demographic associates of children’s active transport to school: a cross-sectional investigation from the URBAN Study
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-11-70
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melody Oliver, Hannah Badland, Suzanne Mavoa, Karen Witten, Robin Kearns, Anne Ellaway, Erica Hinckson, Lisa Mackay, Philip J Schluter

Abstract

Active transport (e.g., walking, cycling) to school (ATS) can contribute to children's physical activity and health. The built environment is acknowledged as an important factor in understanding children's ATS, alongside parental factors and seasonality. Inconsistencies in methodological approaches exist, and a clear understanding of factors related to ATS remains equivocal. The purpose of this study was to gain a better understanding of associates of children's ATS, by considering the effects of daily weather patterns and neighbourhood walk ability and neighbourhood preferences (i.e., for living in a high or low walkable neighbourhood) on this behaviour.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 253 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 249 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 15%
Researcher 33 13%
Student > Bachelor 21 8%
Student > Postgraduate 17 7%
Other 46 18%
Unknown 55 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 56 22%
Sports and Recreations 24 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 9%
Engineering 13 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 4%
Other 52 21%
Unknown 74 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2019.
All research outputs
#4,457,791
of 24,468,058 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1,263
of 2,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,507
of 231,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#13
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,468,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,049 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.0. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.