↓ Skip to main content

Identification and Treatment Optimization of Comorbid Depression in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Rheumatology and Therapy, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Identification and Treatment Optimization of Comorbid Depression in Rheumatoid Arthritis
Published in
Rheumatology and Therapy, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40744-017-0072-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mellissa H. Withers, Louella T. Gonzalez, George A. Karpouzas

Abstract

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) suffer from high rates of depression but depression often remains undiagnosed and untreated among RA patients. Because of its high prevalence and its profound impact on functional disability and health-related quality of life, prompt recognition and management of comorbid depression is urgently needed in patients with RA. Rheumatologists face the challenge of addressing depression in their clinical interactions with patients. The purpose of this paper is to present the prevalence of comorbid depression in RA, to delineate the consequences of depression among RA patients, to discuss the barriers to the identification of depression among RA patients, and to outline a set of recommendations to identify and treat comorbid depression that could be implemented within the rheumatology clinic setting. A comprehensive approach to the management of both physical and mental health needs of RA patients can aid in improving patient overall quality of life. New clinical protocols should be developed to include routine depression screening as part of the rheumatology visit. Patient education to address misconceptions, knowledge gaps, and destigmatize depression is also recommended. More counseling resources, including emotional support groups, are necessary to provide treatment for those suffering from depression. Such interventions could help mitigate disability, improve quality of life, patient function, and overall satisfaction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Other 3 7%
Librarian 3 7%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 9 21%
Unknown 15 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 14 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2017.
All research outputs
#15,475,586
of 22,997,544 outputs
Outputs from Rheumatology and Therapy
#279
of 482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,130
of 287,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rheumatology and Therapy
#12
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,997,544 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.