| Title |
Effects of a TELephone Counselling Intervention by Pharmacist (TelCIP) on medication adherence, patient beliefs and satisfaction with information for patients starting treatment: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-14-219 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marcel J Kooy, Erica CG van Geffen, Eibert R Heerdink, Liset van Dijk, Marcel L Bouvy |
| Abstract |
Adherence to medication is often low. Pharmacists may improve adherence, but a one-size-fits-all approach will not work: different patients have different needs. Goal of the current study is to assess the effectiveness of a patient-tailored, telephone-based intervention by a pharmacist at the start of pharmacotherapy aimed at improving medication adherence, satisfaction with information and counselling and the beliefs about medicines. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 148 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Researcher | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 15% |
| Unknown | 45 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 19% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 26 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 11% |
| Psychology | 9 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 11% |
| Unknown | 45 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2016.
All research outputs
#19,333,199
of 23,931,731 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#6,833
of 8,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,780
of 229,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#108
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,931,731 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.