↓ Skip to main content

Embodied free will beliefs: Some effects of physical states on metaphysical opinions

Overview of attention for article published in Consciousness & Cognition, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
47 X users
weibo
2 weibo users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Embodied free will beliefs: Some effects of physical states on metaphysical opinions
Published in
Consciousness & Cognition, June 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.concog.2014.05.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael R. Ent, Roy F. Baumeister

Abstract

The present research suggests that people's bodily states affect their beliefs about free will. People with epilepsy and people with panic disorder, which are disorders characterized by a lack of control over one's body, reported less belief in free will compared to people without such disorders (Study 1). The more intensely people felt sexual desire, physical tiredness, and the urge to urinate, the less they believed in free will (Study 2). Among non-dieters, the more intensely they felt hunger, the less they believed in free will. However, dieters showed a trend in the opposite direction (Study 3).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
Germany 2 1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Unknown 129 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 25%
Student > Master 22 16%
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 13 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 70 50%
Linguistics 9 6%
Social Sciences 9 6%
Philosophy 7 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 5%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 16 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 132. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2018.
All research outputs
#315,052
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Consciousness & Cognition
#53
of 1,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,577
of 241,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Consciousness & Cognition
#1
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.