| Title |
Ketamine does not increase intracranial pressure compared with opioids: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Anesthesia, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00540-014-1845-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xin Wang, Xibing Ding, Yao Tong, Jiaying Zong, Xiang Zhao, Hao Ren, Quan Li |
| Abstract |
Ketamine is traditionally avoided in sedation management of patients with risk of intracranial hypertension. However, results from many clinical trials contradict this concern. We critically analyzed the published data of the effects of ketamine on intracranial pressure (ICP) and other cerebral hemodynamics to determine whether ketamine was safe for patients with hemodynamic instability and brain injuries. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 17% |
| Australia | 6 | 17% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Singapore | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 8 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 28% |
| Scientists | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 131 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 19 | 14% |
| Researcher | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 36 | 27% |
| Unknown | 28 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 75 | 57% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 3% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 28 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,028,455
of 25,782,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Anesthesia
#7
of 963 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,655
of 241,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Anesthesia
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 963 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.