↓ Skip to main content

Identifying Risk Factors for HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorders Using the International HIV Dementia Scale

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
Title
Identifying Risk Factors for HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorders Using the International HIV Dementia Scale
Published in
Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11481-013-9505-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara Cross, Nur Önen, Amber Gase, Edgar Turner Overton, Beau M. Ances

Abstract

HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) persist despite great advancements in combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). The gold standard for diagnosing cognitive impairment consists of a time-consuming neuropsychological battery of tests given by a trained neuropsychologist, however in the outpatient HIV clinic this is not feasible. The International HIV Dementia Scale (IHDS) was developed to help identify individuals with cognitive impairment in the outpatient setting. The IHDS is moderately sensitive for detecting more symptomatic forms of HAND but sensitivity has been shown to be poor in mild impairment. The IHDS has not been evaluated in developed countries in large cohort populations. We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study of only HIV+ individuals in an urban clinic and evaluated the prevalence of HAND and associated risk factors for cognitive impairment using the IHDS. A total of 507 HIV+ individuals participated in the study of which the majority were male (65 %) and African American (68 %); and 41 % had cognitive impairment. On multivariate analysis, African American race (p = 2.21), older age (p = 1.03), high school education or less (p = 2.03) and depression (p = 1.05) were associated with cognitive impairment. The high prevalence of HAND in this group suggests that more severe forms of HAND persist despite cART. Identified risk factors were non-HIV-related and suggest that environmental and sociodemographic factors have a significant impact on cognitive functioning and should be given more attention. The IHDS should be further evaluated in large cohort HIV+ and HIV- populations in the United States, as there remains a significant need to identify an effective brief screening tool for cognitive impairment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 101 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 17%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Other 6 6%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 23 22%
Unknown 30 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 29%
Psychology 12 12%
Neuroscience 9 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 31 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2014.
All research outputs
#21,699,788
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology
#515
of 583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,952
of 214,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.