↓ Skip to main content

Early Life Origins of Metabolic Syndrome: The Role of Environmental Toxicants

Overview of attention for article published in Current Environmental Health Reports, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Early Life Origins of Metabolic Syndrome: The Role of Environmental Toxicants
Published in
Current Environmental Health Reports, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s40572-013-0004-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guoying Wang, Zhu Chen, Tami Bartell, Xiaobin Wang

Abstract

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) affects more than 47 million people in the U.S. Even more alarming, MetS, once regarded as an "adult problem", has become increasingly common in children. To date, most related research and intervention efforts have occurred in the adult medicine arena, with limited understanding of the root causes and lengthy latency of MetS. This review highlights new science on the early life origins of MetS, with a particular focus on exposure to two groups of environmental toxicants: endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) and metals during the prenatal and early postnatal periods, and their specific effects and important differences in the development of MetS. It also summarizes available data on epigenetic effects, including the role of EDCs in the androgen/estrogen pathways. Emerging evidence supports the link between exposures to environmental toxicants during early life and the development of MetS later in life. Additional research is needed to address important research gaps in this area, including prospective birth cohort studies to delineate temporal and dose-response relationships, important differences in the effects of various environmental toxicants and their joint effects on MetS, as well as epigenetic mechanisms underlying the effects of specific toxicants such as EDCs and metals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 42 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Researcher 4 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 15 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 11%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 19 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2014.
All research outputs
#20,230,558
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Current Environmental Health Reports
#310
of 323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,308
of 304,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Environmental Health Reports
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.