↓ Skip to main content

Regulation of Regeneration by Heparan Sulfate Proteoglycans in the Extracellular Matrix

Overview of attention for article published in Regenerative Engineering and Translational Medicine, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 133)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Regulation of Regeneration by Heparan Sulfate Proteoglycans in the Extracellular Matrix
Published in
Regenerative Engineering and Translational Medicine, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40883-017-0037-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

David M. Gardiner

Abstract

Just as the building of a house requires a blueprint, the rebuilding of lost or damaged body parts through regeneration requires a set of instructions for the assembly of the various tissues into the right places. Much progress has been made in understanding how to control the differentiation of different cell types to provide the building blocks for regeneration, such as bone, muscle, blood vessels and nerves/Schwann cells. These are the cells that follow the blueprint (the pattern-following cells) and end up in the right places relative to each other in order to restore the lost function. Much less is known about the cells that are specialized to generate and regenerate the blueprint (the pattern-forming cells) in order to instruct the pattern-following cells as to how and where to rebuild the structures. Recent studies provide evidence that the pattern-forming cells synthesize an information-rich extracellular matrix (ECM) that controls the behavior of pattern-following cells leading to the regeneration of limb structures. The ability of the ECM to do this is associated with glycosaminoglycans that have specific spatial and temporal modifications of sulfation patterns. This mechanism for controlling pattern formation appears to be conserved between salamanders and mammals, and thus the next challenge for inducing human regeneration is to identify and understand the biology of these pattern-forming cells and the ECM that they synthesize.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Lecturer 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 5 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Chemistry 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2017.
All research outputs
#15,475,586
of 22,997,544 outputs
Outputs from Regenerative Engineering and Translational Medicine
#46
of 133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,350
of 317,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Regenerative Engineering and Translational Medicine
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,997,544 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 133 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.