↓ Skip to main content

The physiology of the pedunculopontine nucleus: implications for deep brain stimulation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neural Transmission, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
The physiology of the pedunculopontine nucleus: implications for deep brain stimulation
Published in
Journal of Neural Transmission, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00702-014-1243-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. Garcia-Rill, J. Hyde, N. Kezunovic, F. J. Urbano, E. Petersen

Abstract

This brief review resolves a number of persistent conflicts regarding the location and characteristics of the mesencephalic locomotor region, which has in the past been described as not locomotion-specific and is more likely the pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN). The parameters of stimulation used to elicit changes in posture and locomotion we now know are ideally suited to match the intrinsic membrane properties of PPN neurons. The physiology of these cells is important not only because it is a major element of the reticular activating system, but also because it is a novel target for the treatment of gait and postural deficits in Parkinson's disease (PD). The discussion explains many of the effects reported following deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the PPN by different groups and provides guidelines for the determination of long-term assessment and effects of PPN DBS. A greater understanding of the physiology of the target nuclei within the brainstem and basal ganglia, amassed over the past decades, has enabled increasingly better patient outcomes from DBS for movement disorders. Despite these improvements, there remains a great opportunity for further understanding of the mechanisms through which DBS has its effects and for further development of appropriate technology to effect these treatments. We review the scientific basis for one of the newest targets, the PPN, in the treatment of PD and other movement disorders, and address the needs for further investigation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 78 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 21%
Researcher 17 21%
Student > Master 8 10%
Professor 5 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 22 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 21 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 15%
Engineering 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 25 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2019.
All research outputs
#18,372,841
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neural Transmission
#1,419
of 1,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,233
of 226,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neural Transmission
#11
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.