↓ Skip to main content

Influence of interradicular and palatal placement of orthodontic mini-implants on the success (survival) rate

Overview of attention for article published in Head & Face Medicine, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
Influence of interradicular and palatal placement of orthodontic mini-implants on the success (survival) rate
Published in
Head & Face Medicine, June 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13005-017-0147-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan Hourfar, Dirk Bister, Georgios Kanavakis, Jörg Alexander Lisson, Björn Ludwig

Abstract

The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to investigate the success rates of orthodontic mini-implants (OMIs) placed in different insertion sites and to analyse patient and site- related factors that influence mini-implant survival. Three hundred eighty-seven OMIs were inserted in 239 patients for orthodontic anchorage and were loaded with a force greater than 2 N. Two different insertion sites were compared: 1. buccal inter-radicular and 2. palatal, at the level of the third palatal ruga. Survival was analysed for location and select patient parameters (age, gender and oral hygiene). The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. The overall success rate was 89.1%. There were statistically significant differences between insertion sites; success rate was 98.4% for OMIs placed in the anterior palate and 71% for OMIs inserted buccal between roots (p < 0.001). Success rate of OMIs was primarily affected by the insertion site. The anterior palate was a more successful location compared to buccal alveolar bone.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 16%
Student > Postgraduate 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 24 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Materials Science 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 25 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2017.
All research outputs
#18,567,744
of 22,997,544 outputs
Outputs from Head & Face Medicine
#183
of 334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,155
of 317,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Head & Face Medicine
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,997,544 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 334 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.