↓ Skip to main content

Pathological Internet use among European adolescents: psychopathology and self-destructive behaviours

Overview of attention for article published in European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
191 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
440 Mendeley
Title
Pathological Internet use among European adolescents: psychopathology and self-destructive behaviours
Published in
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00787-014-0562-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Kaess, Tony Durkee, Romuald Brunner, Vladimir Carli, Peter Parzer, Camilla Wasserman, Marco Sarchiapone, Christina Hoven, Alan Apter, Judit Balazs, Maria Balint, Julio Bobes, Renaud Cohen, Doina Cosman, Padraig Cotter, Gloria Fischer, Birgitta Floderus, Miriam Iosue, Christian Haring, Jean-Pierre Kahn, George J. Musa, Bogdan Nemes, Vita Postuvan, Franz Resch, Pilar A. Saiz, Merike Sisask, Avigal Snir, Airi Varnik, Janina Žiberna, Danuta Wasserman

Abstract

Rising global rates of pathological Internet use (PIU) and related psychological impairments have gained considerable attention in recent years. In an effort to acquire evidence-based knowledge of this relationship, the main objective of this study was to investigate the association between PIU, psychopathology and self-destructive behaviours among school-based adolescents in eleven European countries. This cross-sectional study was implemented within the framework of the European Union project: Saving and Empowering Young Lives in Europe. A representative sample of 11,356 school-based adolescents (M/F: 4,856/6,500; mean age: 14.9) was included in the analyses. PIU was assessed using the Young's Diagnostic Questionnaire. Psychopathology was measured using the Beck Depression Inventory-II, Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Self-destructive behaviours were evaluated by the Deliberate Self-Harm Inventory and Paykel Suicide Scale. Results showed that suicidal behaviours (suicidal ideation and suicide attempts), depression, anxiety, conduct problems and hyperactivity/inattention were significant and independent predictors of PIU. The correlation between PIU, conduct problems and hyperactivity/inattention was stronger among females, while the link between PIU and symptoms of depression, anxiety and peer relationship problems was stronger among males. The association between PIU, psychopathology and self-destructive behaviours was stronger in countries with a higher prevalence of PIU and suicide rates. These findings ascertain that psychopathology and suicidal behaviours are strongly related to PIU. This association is significantly influenced by gender and country suggesting socio-cultural influences. At the clinical and public health levels, targeting PIU among adolescents in the early stages could potentially lead to improvements of psychological well-being and a reduction of suicidal behaviours.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 440 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 432 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 60 14%
Student > Bachelor 57 13%
Researcher 44 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 35 8%
Other 86 20%
Unknown 115 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 119 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 83 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 7%
Social Sciences 29 7%
Neuroscience 10 2%
Other 37 8%
Unknown 133 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2015.
All research outputs
#13,915,695
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
#1,091
of 1,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,596
of 227,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
#16
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.