↓ Skip to main content

How a hobby can shape cognition: visual word recognition in competitive Scrabble players

Overview of attention for article published in Memory & Cognition, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 1,578)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
Title
How a hobby can shape cognition: visual word recognition in competitive Scrabble players
Published in
Memory & Cognition, August 2011
DOI 10.3758/s13421-011-0137-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ian S. Hargreaves, Penny M. Pexman, Lenka Zdrazilova, Peter Sargious

Abstract

Competitive Scrabble is an activity that involves extraordinary word recognition experience. We investigated whether that experience is associated with exceptional behavior in the laboratory in a classic visual word recognition paradigm: the lexical decision task (LDT). We used a version of the LDT that involved horizontal and vertical presentation and a concreteness manipulation. In Experiment 1, we presented this task to a group of undergraduates, as these participants are the typical sample in word recognition studies. In Experiment 2, we compared the performance of a group of competitive Scrabble players with a group of age-matched nonexpert control participants. The results of a series of cognitive assessments showed that the Scrabble players and control participants differed only in Scrabble-specific skills (e.g., anagramming). Scrabble expertise was associated with two specific effects (as compared to controls): vertical fluency (relatively less difficulty judging lexicality for words presented in the vertical orientation) and semantic deemphasis (smaller concreteness effects for word responses). These results suggest that visual word recognition is shaped by experience, and that with experience there are efficiencies to be had even in the adult word recognition system.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 71 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 23%
Student > Bachelor 13 18%
Student > Master 8 11%
Lecturer 7 10%
Researcher 5 7%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 32 44%
Linguistics 8 11%
Computer Science 5 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 12 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 120. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2023.
All research outputs
#309,492
of 23,655,983 outputs
Outputs from Memory & Cognition
#17
of 1,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,082
of 122,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memory & Cognition
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,655,983 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.