| Title |
Phylogeography and population history of Leopardus guigna, the smallest American felid
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10592-014-0566-3 |
| Authors |
Constanza Napolitano, Warren E. Johnson, Jim Sanderson, Stephen J. O’Brien, A. Rus Hoelzel, Rachel Freer, Nigel Dunstone, Kermit Ritland, Carol E. Ritland, Elie Poulin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 36% |
| Cayman Islands | 1 | 9% |
| Canada | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 5 | 3% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 180 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 13% |
| Professor | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 39 | 20% |
| Unknown | 36 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 89 | 46% |
| Environmental Science | 27 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 43 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2020.
All research outputs
#3,506,541
of 24,462,749 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#200
of 1,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,412
of 316,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,462,749 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,111 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,179 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.