↓ Skip to main content

Is Physician Self‐disclosure Related to Patient Evaluation of Office Visits?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, August 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
Title
Is Physician Self‐disclosure Related to Patient Evaluation of Office Visits?
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, August 2004
DOI 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.40040.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary Catherine Beach, Debra Roter, Haya Rubin, Richard Frankel, Wendy Levinson, Daniel E Ford

Abstract

Physician self-disclosure has been viewed either positively or negatively, but little is known about how patients respond to physician self-disclosure. To explore the possible relationship of physician self-disclosure to patient satisfaction. Routine office visits were audiotaped and coded for physician self-disclosure using the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS). Physician self-disclosure was defined as a statement describing the physician's personal experience that has medical and/or emotional relevance for the patient. We stratified our analysis by physician specialty and compared patient satisfaction following visits in which physician self-disclosure did or did not occur. Patients (N= 1,265) who visited 59 primary care physicians and 65 surgeons. Patient satisfaction following the visit. Physician self-disclosure occurred in 17% (102/589) of primary care visits and 14% (93/676) of surgical visits. Following visits in which a primary care physician self-disclosed, fewer patients reported feelings of warmth/friendliness (37% vs 52%; P =.008) and reassurance/comfort (42% vs 55%; P =.027), and fewer reported being very satisfied with the visit (74% vs 83%; P =.031). Following visits in which a surgeon self-disclosed, more patients reported feelings of warmth/friendliness (60% vs 45%; P =.009) and reassurance/comfort (59% vs 47%; P=.044), and more reported being very satisfied with the visit (88% vs 75%; P =.007). After adjustment for patient characteristics, length of the visit, and other physician communication behaviors, primary care patients remained less satisfied (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24 to 0.81) and surgical patients more satisfied (AOR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.12 to 4.50) after visits in which the physician self-disclosed. Physician self-disclosure is significantly associated with higher patient satisfaction ratings for surgical visits and lower patient satisfaction ratings for primary care visits. Further study is needed to explore these intriguing findings and to define the circumstances under which physician self-disclosure is either well or poorly received.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Canada 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 98 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 23%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 24 23%
Unknown 15 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 28%
Psychology 17 16%
Social Sciences 17 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 21 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,626,251
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1,915
of 8,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,804
of 65,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.