| Title |
Competing neighbors: light perception and root function
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00442-014-2983-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pedro E. Gundel, Ronald Pierik, Liesje Mommer, Carlos L. Ballaré |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 2 | 20% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 10% |
| France | 1 | 10% |
| Chile | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 40% |
| Scientists | 4 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 3 | 2% |
| Mexico | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 154 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 20% |
| Researcher | 25 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 39 | 23% |
| Unknown | 27 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 104 | 62% |
| Environmental Science | 20 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Engineering | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 30 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2020.
All research outputs
#6,406,971
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,184
of 4,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,381
of 243,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#10
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,603 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.