You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Remote school gardens: exploring a cost‐effective and novel way to engage Australian Indigenous students in nutrition and health
|
---|---|
Published in |
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1111/1753-6405.12236 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Andrew Hume, Alexander Wetten, Camilla Feeney, Sally Taylor, Kerin O'Dea, Julie Brimblecombe |
Abstract |
This pilot study aimed to determine the feasibility of a novel, low-cost program to get remote schools started in gardening and nutrition activities, for a lower cost than existing models, and without on-the-ground horticultural support. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 5 | 83% |
Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 2 | 2% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 117 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 30 | 25% |
Researcher | 14 | 12% |
Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 6% |
Other | 21 | 18% |
Unknown | 26 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 18% |
Social Sciences | 18 | 15% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 12% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 8% |
Arts and Humanities | 6 | 5% |
Other | 21 | 18% |
Unknown | 30 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2014.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
#1,065
of 1,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,669
of 242,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
#7
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,008 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.