↓ Skip to main content

The physiological equivalent temperature – a universal index for the biometeorological assessment of the thermal environment

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Biometeorology, October 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1595 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
875 Mendeley
Title
The physiological equivalent temperature – a universal index for the biometeorological assessment of the thermal environment
Published in
International Journal of Biometeorology, October 1999
DOI 10.1007/s004840050118
Pubmed ID
Authors

P. Höppe

Abstract

With considerably increased coverage of weather information in the news media in recent years in many countries, there is also more demand for data that are applicable and useful for everyday life. Both the perception of the thermal component of weather as well as the appropriate clothing for thermal comfort result from the integral effects of all meteorological parameters relevant for heat exchange between the body and its environment. Regulatory physiological processes can affect the relative importance of meteorological parameters, e.g. wind velocity becomes more important when the body is sweating. In order to take into account all these factors, it is necessary to use a heat-balance model of the human body. The physiological equivalent temperature (PET) is based on the Munich Energy-balance Model for Individuals (MEMI), which models the thermal conditions of the human body in a physiologically relevant way. PET is defined as the air temperature at which, in a typical indoor setting (without wind and solar radiation), the heat budget of the human body is balanced with the same core and skin temperature as under the complex outdoor conditions to be assessed. This way PET enables a layperson to compare the integral effects of complex thermal conditions outside with his or her own experience indoors. On hot summer days, for example, with direct solar irradiation the PET value may be more than 20 K higher than the air temperature, on a windy day in winter up to 15 K lower.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 875 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Other 6 <1%
Unknown 852 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 176 20%
Student > Master 135 15%
Researcher 108 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 51 6%
Student > Bachelor 48 5%
Other 136 16%
Unknown 221 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 183 21%
Environmental Science 146 17%
Design 51 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 49 6%
Arts and Humanities 33 4%
Other 132 15%
Unknown 281 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,033,572
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Biometeorology
#75
of 1,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#449
of 36,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Biometeorology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,464 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 36,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them