| Title |
Oral and dental late effects in survivors of childhood cancer: a Children’s Oncology Group report
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Supportive Care in Cancer, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00520-014-2260-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karen E. Effinger, Cesar A. Migliorati, Melissa M. Hudson, Kevin P. McMullen, Sue C. Kaste, Kathy Ruble, Gregory M. T. Guilcher, Ami J. Shah, Sharon M. Castellino |
| Abstract |
Multi-modality therapy has resulted in improved survival for childhood malignancies. The Children's Oncology Group Long-Term Follow-Up Guidelines for Survivors of Childhood, Adolescent, and Young Adult Cancers provide practitioners with exposure- and risk-based recommendations for the surveillance and management of asymptomatic survivors who are at least 2 years from completion of therapy. This review outlines the pathophysiology and risks for oral and dental late effects in pediatric cancer survivors and the rationale for oral and dental screening recommended by the Children's Oncology Group. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Vietnam | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 177 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 33 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 11% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 7% |
| Researcher | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 40 | 22% |
| Unknown | 49 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 82 | 46% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Unknown | 61 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2023.
All research outputs
#14,842,555
of 23,746,606 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#2,881
of 4,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,746
of 228,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#30
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,746,606 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.