Title |
Outcome stagnation of liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis in the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease era
|
---|---|
Published in |
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00423-014-1214-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Johannes Klose, Michelle A. Klose, Courtney Metz, Frank Lehner, Michael P. Manns, Juergen Klempnauer, Nils Hoppe, Harald Schrem, Alexander Kaltenborn |
Abstract |
Survival after liver transplantation (LTX) has decreased in Germany since the implementation of Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD)-based liver allocation. Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is known for its otherwise excellent outcome after LTX. The influence of MELD-based liver allocation and subsequent allocation policy alterations on the outcome of LTX for PSC is analyzed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 33% |
Germany | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 27 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 18% |
Researcher | 4 | 14% |
Librarian | 3 | 11% |
Other | 3 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 9 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 39% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Psychology | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 11 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2014.
All research outputs
#14,574,585
of 23,340,595 outputs
Outputs from Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
#554
of 1,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,505
of 229,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,340,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,166 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.