| Title |
Long-Term Chronic Opioid Therapy Discontinuation Rates from the TROUP Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-011-1771-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bradley C. Martin, Ming-Yu Fan, Mark J. Edlund, Andrea DeVries, Jennifer Brennan Braden, Mark D. Sullivan |
| Abstract |
To report chronic opioid therapy discontinuation rates after five years and identify factors associated with discontinuation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 4% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 112 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 28 | 24% |
| Unknown | 26 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 6% |
| Psychology | 6 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 35 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,928,695
of 25,727,480 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1,450
of 8,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,509
of 129,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#9
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,727,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,239 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.