↓ Skip to main content

Taming the chronic kidney disease epidemic: a global view of surveillance efforts

Overview of attention for article published in Kidney International, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Taming the chronic kidney disease epidemic: a global view of surveillance efforts
Published in
Kidney International, June 2014
DOI 10.1038/ki.2014.190
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jai Radhakrishnan, Giuseppe Remuzzi, Rajiv Saran, Desmond E. Williams, Nilka Rios-Burrows, Neil Powe, for the CDC-CKD Surveillance Team, Katharina Brück, Christoph Wanner, Vianda S. Stel, on behalf of the European CKD Burden Consortium, Sree K. Venuthurupalli, Wendy E. Hoy, Helen G. Healy, Anne Salisbury, Robert G. Fassett, on behalf of the CKD.QLD group, Donal O'Donoghue, Paul Roderick, Seiichi Matsuo, Akira Hishida, Enyu Imai, Satoshi Iimuro

Abstract

Chronic kidney disease is now recognized to be a worldwide problem associated with significant morbidity and mortality and there is a steep increase in the number of patients reaching end-stage renal disease. In many parts of the world, the disease affects younger people without diabetes or hypertension. The costs to family and society can be enormous. Early recognition of CKD may help prevent disease progression and the subsequent decline in health and longevity. Surveillance programs for early CKD detection are beginning to be implemented in a few countries. In this article, we will focus on the challenges and successes of these programs with the hope that their eventual and widespread use will reduce the complications, deaths, disabilities, and economic burdens associated with CKD worldwide.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 122 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 12%
Researcher 13 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 45 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 47 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2015.
All research outputs
#2,485,853
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Kidney International
#972
of 7,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,168
of 242,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Kidney International
#6
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,405 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,199 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.