↓ Skip to main content

A novel method for non-invasive plaque morphology analysis by coronary computed tomography angiography

Overview of attention for article published in The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
14 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
A novel method for non-invasive plaque morphology analysis by coronary computed tomography angiography
Published in
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10554-014-0461-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shinichiro Fujimoto, Takeshi Kondo, Takahide Kodama, Yasuko Fujisawa, John Groarke, Kanako K. Kumamaru, Kazuhisa Takamura, Eriko Matsunaga, Katsumi Miyauchi, Hiroyuki Daida, Frank J. Rybicki

Abstract

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) plaque morphology based on conventional Hounsfield units relies on absolute CT numbers is influenced by imaging and anatomical variables. The project describes and tests a novel alternative method, termed the "labeling method", which uses relative CT numbers and 3-dimensional plaque structure. Using virtual histology intravascular ultrasound (VH-IVUS) as the reference standard, this study compares the labeling method to a conventional CT-number based method to determine coronary plaque morphology. Thirty-seven high-risk, non-calcified atherosclerotic coronary lesions were prospectively evaluated in 33 consecutive patients who underwent CCTA followed by VH-IVUS (mean interval 8.6 ± 13.3 days). CCTA-derived vessel and minimum lumen areas were compared to VH-IVUS measures. Fibrotic and necrotic core areas were calculated by both the labeling method to the CT-number based method; both were tested for agreement with reference standard VH-IVUS. Inter- and intra-observer correlations were assessed. CCTA significantly underestimated minimum lumen area when compared to VH-IVUS (mean difference -1.4 ± 0.9 mm(2), p < 0.0001). Necrotic core and fibrous areas quantified using the labeling method demonstrated superior correlation with VH-IVUS compared to those quantified using the CT-number based method, Pearson's r = 0.75 versus 0.42 and r = 0.80 and 0.59, respectively. Compared to VH-IVUS, limits of agreement for the labeling method-derived necrotic core (-2.0 to 2.5 mm(2)) and fibrous areas (0.6-8.0 mm(2)) were more narrow than those determined using the CT-number based method (-3.7 to 7.3 and -4.0 to 8.9 mm(2), respectively). Inter- and intraobserver correlations were excellent for all CCTA derived measures (r = 0.85-0.98). A novel CCTA-based labeling method offers an alternative to conventional CT-number based analyses for plaque morphology. The labeling method demonstrates superior correlation to VH-IVUS for measures of fibrotic and necrotic core areas within non-calcified coronary atherosclerotic plaques.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 25 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 6 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 46%
Engineering 3 12%
Physics and Astronomy 2 8%
Computer Science 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2023.
All research outputs
#7,205,295
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
#229
of 2,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,625
of 242,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
#4
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,012 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.