↓ Skip to main content

A Developmental Neuroscience of Borderline Pathology: Emotion Dysregulation and Social Baseline Theory

Overview of attention for article published in Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
285 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
A Developmental Neuroscience of Borderline Pathology: Emotion Dysregulation and Social Baseline Theory
Published in
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10802-011-9555-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amy E. Hughes, Sheila E. Crowell, Lauren Uyeji, James A. Coan

Abstract

Theoretical and empirical research has linked poor emotion regulation abilities with dysfunctional frontolimbic circuitry. Consistent with this, research on borderline personality disorder (BPD) finds that frontolimbic dysfunction is a predominant neural substrate underlying the disorder. Emotion regulation is profoundly compromised in BPD. However, BPD is also associated with broad impairment across multiple domains, including impulse control, interpersonal relationships, and cognitive functioning. To date, BPD research has focused largely on single areas of dysfunction, failing to account for overlap at either the biological or behavioral levels of analysis. We examine the literature on frontolimbic dysfunction in BPD within the context of Coan's social baseline theory. Social baseline theory proposes that healthy human functioning is dependent upon adequate social support and that, at baseline, biological systems are adapted to operate interdependently rather than independently. The social baseline perspective is particularly useful for understanding borderline personality development because the impulsive and emotionally dysregulated behaviors common among those with BPD occur almost invariably within an interpersonal context. We discuss clinical and research implications of this work.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 285 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 280 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 16%
Student > Bachelor 41 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 12%
Researcher 30 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 8%
Other 51 18%
Unknown 59 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 151 53%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 9%
Social Sciences 12 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 4%
Neuroscience 9 3%
Other 15 5%
Unknown 63 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2022.
All research outputs
#4,229,156
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#409
of 2,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,309
of 121,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#14
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,687 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.