| Title |
Current issues in Chinese Neolithic archaeology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of World Prehistory, June 1997
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02221203 |
| Authors |
Anne P. Underhill |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Argentina | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| Philippines | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 74 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 26% |
| Researcher | 16 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 10 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 27 | 31% |
| Arts and Humanities | 25 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 12% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2011.
All research outputs
#4,619,006
of 22,649,029 outputs
Outputs from Journal of World Prehistory
#71
of 195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,037
of 30,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of World Prehistory
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,649,029 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 30,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.