Title |
Multidimensional analyses of the learning curve of robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: 3-phase learning process comparison
|
---|---|
Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00464-014-3569-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Eun Jung Park, Chang Woo Kim, Min Soo Cho, Seung Hyuk Baik, Dong Wook Kim, Byung Soh Min, Kang Young Lee, Nam Kyu Kim |
Abstract |
Robotic surgery has advantages to perform rectal cancer by its ergonomic designs and advanced technologies. However, it was uncertain whether these core robotic technologies could shorten the learning curve. The aim of this study is to investigate the learning curve of robotic rectal cancer surgery and to compare the learning curve phases with respect to perioperative clinicopathologic outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 67% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
Other | 8 | 11% |
Researcher | 8 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
Other | 17 | 23% |
Unknown | 21 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 51% |
Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
Mathematics | 1 | 1% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Unknown | 26 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2014.
All research outputs
#14,196,917
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#3,247
of 6,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,080
of 228,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#100
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,022 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.