↓ Skip to main content

Functional diversity of dinoflagellate symbionts in corals

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Microbiology, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Functional diversity of dinoflagellate symbionts in corals
Published in
Environmental Microbiology, June 2014
DOI 10.1111/1462-2920.12518
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mathieu Pernice, Simon R Dunn, Linda Tonk, Sophie Dove, Isabelle Domart-Coulon, Peter Hoppe, Arno Schintlmeister, Michael Wagner, Anders Meibom

Abstract

Nutritional interactions between corals and symbiotic dinoflagellate algae lie at the heart of the structural foundation of coral reefs. Whilst the genetic diversity of Symbiodinium has attracted particular interest because of its contribution to the sensitivity of corals to environmental changes and bleaching (i.e. disruption of coral-dinoflagellate symbiosis), very little is known about the in hospite metabolic capabilities of different Symbiodinium types. Using a combination of stable isotopic labelling and nanoscale secondary ion mass spectrometry (NanoSIMS), we investigated the ability of the intact symbiosis between the reef-building coral Isopora palifera, and Symbiodinium C or D types, to assimilate dissolved inorganic carbon (via photosynthesis) and nitrogen (as ammonium). Our results indicate that Symbiodinium types from two clades naturally associated with I. palifera possess different metabolic capabilities. The Symbiodinium C type fixed and passed significantly more carbon and nitrogen to its coral host than the D type. This study provides further insights into the metabolic plasticity among different Symbiodinium types in hospite and strengthens the evidence that the more temperature-tolerant Symbiodinium D type may be less metabolically beneficial for its coral host under non-stressful conditions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Unknown 102 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 24%
Researcher 19 18%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 21 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 39%
Environmental Science 21 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 3%
Chemistry 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 23 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2016.
All research outputs
#19,177,100
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Microbiology
#3,770
of 4,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,066
of 231,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Microbiology
#41
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,506 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.