↓ Skip to main content

Role of 3D Echocardiography in Cardiac Surgery: Strengths and Limitations

Overview of attention for article published in Current Anesthesiology Reports, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Role of 3D Echocardiography in Cardiac Surgery: Strengths and Limitations
Published in
Current Anesthesiology Reports, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40140-017-0226-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edwin Wilberforce Turton, Jörg Ender

Abstract

This review aims to highlight the general and specific strengths and limitations of intraoperative 3D echocardiography. This article explains the value of real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (RT 3D TEE) during cardiac surgery and cardiac interventions. Recently published recommendations and guidelines include the use of RT 3D TEE. RT 3 D TEE provides additional value particularly for guidance during cardiac interventions (i.e., transcatheter mitral valve repair, left atrial appendix and atrial septal defect closures), assessment of the mitral valve in surgical repair, measurement of left ventricular outflow tract area for transcatheter valvular replacements, and estimating right and left ventricular volumes and function. The exact localization of paravalvular leakage is another strength of RT 3D TEE. The major limitation is the reduced temporal resolution compared to 2D TEE. Three-dimensional echocardiography is a powerful tool that improves communication and accurate measurements of cardiac structures.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 24%
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 67%
Engineering 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 18%