↓ Skip to main content

Schistosome eggs and inflammatory neutrophils

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular Microbiology, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Schistosome eggs and inflammatory neutrophils
Published in
Cellular Microbiology, June 2014
DOI 10.1111/cmi.12316
Pubmed ID
Authors

Candy Chuah, Malcolm K. Jones, Melissa L. Burke, Donald P. McManus, Helen C. Owen, Geoffrey N. Gobert

Abstract

Neutrophils contribute to the pathological processes of a number of inflammatory disorders, including rheumatoid arthritis, sepsis, and cystic fibrosis. Neutrophils also play prominent roles in schistosomiasis japonica liver fibrosis, being central mediators of inflammation following granuloma formation. In this study, we investigated the interaction between Schistosoma japonicum eggs and neutrophils, and the effect of eggs on the inflammatory phenotype of neutrophils. Our results showed significant up-regulated expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1α, IL-1β and IL-8) and chemokines (CCL3, CCL4, and CXCL2) in neutrophils after 4 hours in vitro stimulation with S. japonicum eggs. Furthermore, mitochondrial DNA was released by stimulated neutrophils, and induced the production of matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9), a protease involved in inflammation and associated tissue destruction. We also found that intact live eggs and isolated soluble egg antigen (SEA) triggered the release of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), but, unlike those reported in bacterial or fungal infection, NETs did not kill schistosome eggs in vitro. Together these show that S. japonicum eggs can induce the inflammatory phenotype of neutrophils, and further our understanding of the host-parasite interplay that takes place within the in vivo microenvironment of schistosome-induced granuloma. These findings represent novel findings in a metazoan parasite, and confirm characteristics of NETs that have until now, only been observed in response to protozoan pathogens.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 45 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 24%
Student > Master 6 13%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Lecturer 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 12 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 12 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2015.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Cellular Microbiology
#1,425
of 1,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,073
of 242,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular Microbiology
#10
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,673 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.