You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Minimum information about a marker gene sequence (MIMARKS) and minimum information about any (x) sequence (MIxS) specifications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Biotechnology, May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nbt.1823 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pelin Yilmaz, Renzo Kottmann, Dawn Field, Rob Knight, James R Cole, Linda Amaral-Zettler, Jack A Gilbert, Ilene Karsch-Mizrachi, Anjanette Johnston, Guy Cochrane, Robert Vaughan, Christopher Hunter, Joonhong Park, Norman Morrison, Philippe Rocca-Serra, Peter Sterk, Manimozhiyan Arumugam, Mark Bailey, Laura Baumgartner, Bruce W Birren, Martin J Blaser, Vivien Bonazzi, Tim Booth, Peer Bork, Frederic D Bushman, Pier Luigi Buttigieg, Patrick S G Chain, Emily Charlson, Elizabeth K Costello, Heather Huot-Creasy, Peter Dawyndt, Todd DeSantis, Noah Fierer, Jed A Fuhrman, Rachel E Gallery, Dirk Gevers, Richard A Gibbs, Inigo San Gil, Antonio Gonzalez, Jeffrey I Gordon, Robert Guralnick, Wolfgang Hankeln, Sarah Highlander, Philip Hugenholtz, Janet Jansson, Andrew L Kau, Scott T Kelley, Jerry Kennedy, Dan Knights, Omry Koren, Justin Kuczynski, Nikos Kyrpides, Robert Larsen, Christian L Lauber, Teresa Legg, Ruth E Ley, Catherine A Lozupone, Wolfgang Ludwig, Donna Lyons, Eamonn Maguire, Barbara A Methé, Folker Meyer, Brian Muegge, Sara Nakielny, Karen E Nelson, Diana Nemergut, Josh D Neufeld, Lindsay K Newbold, Anna E Oliver, Norman R Pace, Giriprakash Palanisamy, Jörg Peplies, Joseph Petrosino, Lita Proctor, Elmar Pruesse, Christian Quast, Jeroen Raes, Sujeevan Ratnasingham, Jacques Ravel, David A Relman, Susanna Assunta-Sansone, Patrick D Schloss, Lynn Schriml, Rohini Sinha, Michelle I Smith, Erica Sodergren, Aymé Spor, Jesse Stombaugh, James M Tiedje, Doyle V Ward, George M Weinstock, Doug Wendel, Owen White, Andrew Whiteley, Andreas Wilke, Jennifer R Wortman, Tanya Yatsunenko, Frank Oliver Glöckner |
| Abstract |
Here we present a standard developed by the Genomic Standards Consortium (GSC) for reporting marker gene sequences--the minimum information about a marker gene sequence (MIMARKS). We also introduce a system for describing the environment from which a biological sample originates. The 'environmental packages' apply to any genome sequence of known origin and can be used in combination with MIMARKS and other GSC checklists. Finally, to establish a unified standard for describing sequence data and to provide a single point of entry for the scientific community to access and learn about GSC checklists, we present the minimum information about any (x) sequence (MIxS). Adoption of MIxS will enhance our ability to analyze natural genetic diversity documented by massive DNA sequencing efforts from myriad ecosystems in our ever-changing biosphere. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 68% |
| Scientists | 6 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 804 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 32 | 4% |
| Brazil | 9 | 1% |
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 4 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Mexico | 3 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 19 | 2% |
| Unknown | 723 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 209 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 179 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 89 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 50 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 47 | 6% |
| Other | 133 | 17% |
| Unknown | 97 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 356 | 44% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 123 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 52 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 31 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 27 | 3% |
| Other | 84 | 10% |
| Unknown | 131 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,191,827
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biotechnology
#2,064
of 8,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,673
of 126,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biotechnology
#4
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.