↓ Skip to main content

Human seminal fluid as a source of prostate cancer-specific microRNA biomarkers

Overview of attention for article published in Endocrine-Related Cancer, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 1,509)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Human seminal fluid as a source of prostate cancer-specific microRNA biomarkers
Published in
Endocrine-Related Cancer, May 2014
DOI 10.1530/erc-14-0234
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luke A Selth, Matthew J Roberts, Clement W K Chow, Villis R Marshall, Suhail A R Doi, Andrew D Vincent, Lisa M Butler, Martin F Lavin, Wayne D Tilley, Robert A Gardiner

Abstract

Extract: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy among men living in Western countries and a major cause of cancer-related deaths. Biopsy-based diagnosis of PCa is usually undertaken following an elevated serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) measurement and/or abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE). The deficiencies of serum PSA as a biomarker have been well documented (Roobol and Carlsson 2013). While it is highly specific for tissue of prostatic origin, PSA is not cancer-specific, resulting in many unnecessary biopsies of benign disease. Moreover, PSA screening has resulted in substantial over-diagnosis and over-treatment of indolent tumours without having a significant effect on prostate cancer mortality (Schroder, et al. 2009). Biomarkers that could identify patients with clinically significant PCa would be ideal but are currently lacking ...

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 51 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 21%
Researcher 9 17%
Student > Bachelor 8 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 12 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 17%
Engineering 3 6%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 16 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 142. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2020.
All research outputs
#290,699
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Endocrine-Related Cancer
#4
of 1,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,318
of 240,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Endocrine-Related Cancer
#2
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.